Posted by Juerg (207.194.220.189) on November 14, 2003 at 08:16:47:
After reading all the good and informative info about calibration on test equipment I have to ask some questions to myself :
I have two variabilities :
1. technical Vari.:
Which includes everything from room temp , to caloibration , to tire pressure and so on.
I can controle this very good.
2. biological Vari.
In a publication by the swiss olympic assoc. together with the swiss sportmed assoc. in 2001 . they write :
The biological Vari. will be more than 90 % of the total variability in a endurance test.!!!!
So we face 90% to 10 % .
We spend a lot of time and money in the 10 % and what do we have ?
That's one reason why I should focus even more on changes and trend in the 90 % .
Assessing physiological chances and trends and try to " calibrate " some easy to measure physiological factore would be the goal .
Cris gave me a good hint with his simple structure of fatigue , and thats' where I will do more focusing on again.
I will try to " calibrate " the athlete :
Fixed HR and controle what happend there with Lactate value , bloodsugar value , Oxygen sat. , RPM, watt performance , brething frequency and inspiration /expiration volume and so on.
This sounds complicated , but in fact we can "test " this very easy in the first 15 minutes of any training session and see , what measurement are still or new out of balance , compared with the day before or from a test I did at the beginning of a training block .
Thats' one reason why we test certain info daily , weekli or bi weekly plus total tests every 4 - 6 weeks , depending on the outcome of the short test versions.